Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 146(4): 400e-408e, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32969994

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Young women with congenital breast asymmetry have impaired psychological well-being and self-esteem. However, little is known regarding the effects of surgical intervention in this population. This cohort study aims to assess postoperative changes in health-related quality of life following surgical treatment of breast asymmetry in young women using a prospective, longitudinal study design. METHODS: From 2008 to 2018, 45 young women undergoing surgical correction of breast asymmetry of benign cause and 101 unaffected, female controls completed the following surveys: Short-Form 36v2, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and Eating-Attitudes Test-26. Surveys were administered at baseline and at up to 9-year follow-up. RESULTS: Participants with breast asymmetry scored significantly worse than controls at baseline on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and in two Short-Form 36v2 domains: Social-Functioning and Role-Emotional. Asymmetry participants experienced significant postoperative improvements on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and in three Short-Form 36v2 domains: Role-Physical, Social Functioning, and Mental Health. These improvements were sustained for a minimum of 5 years. Postoperatively, asymmetry participants' quality of life was comparable to controls and did not vary by age at the time of surgery, asymmetry severity, or diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of breast asymmetry in young women yields significant and sustained improvements in psychosocial quality of life. Postoperatively, patients returned to a level of functioning commensurate with their peers. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.


Subject(s)
Breast/abnormalities , Breast/surgery , Mammaplasty , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Cohort Studies , Congenital Abnormalities/psychology , Congenital Abnormalities/surgery , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Prospective Studies , Self Report , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
J Adolesc Health ; 63(6): 759-765, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30279103

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Despite the psychosocial deficits associated with gynecomastia, surgical treatment of adolescent gynecomastia remains controversial. This longitudinal cohort study measures changes in health-related quality of life following surgical treatment of gynecomastia in adolescents. METHODS: The following surveys were administered to adolescents with gynecomastia and male controls, aged 12-21 years: Short-Form 36v2 (SF-36), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), and Eating-Attitudes Test-26. Subjects completed surveys at baseline and postoperatively/at follow-up at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2017, 44 patients undergoing surgical treatment of gynecomastia and 64 unaffected male controls participated in our study. At baseline, gynecomastia patients scored significantly worse than controls on the RSES and in five SF-36 domains: general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scores significantly improved postoperatively on the RSES, and in four SF-36 domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and social functioning. Postoperatively, gynecomastia subjects scored similarly to controls in all SF-36 domains and the RSES. Young and overweight/obese patients and those with severe gynecomastia had the greatest postoperative improvement across survey measures. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of gynecomastia significantly improves the quality of life of adolescents, with measurable improvements in physical and psychosocial functioning. Postoperatively, gynecomastia patients performed comparably to unaffected controls. Surgical treatment of gynecomastia in adolescents and young men has the potential to significantly improve quality of life, particularly in younger and overweight/obese patients and those with moderate to severe gynecomastia. Concerns regarding patient age and body mass index alone should not contraindicate surgery.


Subject(s)
Gynecomastia/surgery , Quality of Life/psychology , Adolescent , Body Mass Index , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Pediatrics ; 140(5)2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28986442

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To measure changes in health-related quality of life and breast-related symptoms after reduction mammaplasty in adolescents. METHODS: In this longitudinal cohort study, we administered the Short-Form 36v2 (SF-36), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), Breast-Related Symptoms Questionnaire (BRSQ), and Eating Attitudes Test-26 to 102 adolescents with macromastia and 84 female controls, aged 12 to 21 years. Patients with macromastia completed surveys preoperatively and after reduction mammaplasty at 6 months and 1, 3, and 5 years. Controls completed baseline and follow-up surveys at the same intervals. RESULTS: Patients with macromastia demonstrated significant score improvements postoperatively from baseline on the RSES, BRSQ, and in 7 out of 8 SF-36 domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health (P < .001, all). By the 6-month follow-up visit, postoperative subjects scored similarly to or more favorably than controls on the RSES, BRSQ, Eating Attitudes Test-26 , and SF-36; these benefits persisted for at least 5 years and were not significantly affected by BMI category or age. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction mammaplasty was significantly associated with improvements in health-related quality of life and breast-related symptoms of adolescent patients, with measureable improvements in physical and psychosocial well-being evident by 6 months postoperatively and still demonstrable after 5-years. These results largely do not vary by BMI category or age. Patients and providers should be aware of the potential positive impact that reduction mammaplasty can provide adolescents with symptomatic macromastia. Historic concerns regarding age and BMI category at the time of surgery should be reconsidered.


Subject(s)
Breast/abnormalities , Hypertrophy/psychology , Hypertrophy/surgery , Mammaplasty/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life/psychology , Self Concept , Adolescent , Breast/surgery , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Mammaplasty/trends , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Breast J ; 21(3): 254-9, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25772491

ABSTRACT

Giant fibroadenomas (5 cm or greater) are benign breast masses that often present in adolescence and require surgical excision. Long-term outcomes, recurrence rates, and the need for additional reconstructive surgery in this population are unknown. Patients aged 11-25 years whose pathology reports indicated the presence of a giant fibroadenoma were eligible for this study. Medical records were reviewed for presentation, treatment, and outcomes. A subset of patients completed an investigator-designed long-term outcome survey to measure additional outcomes and the desire or need for subsequent reconstructive surgery. Forty-six patients with at least one giant fibroadenoma (mean size 7.4 ± 2.8 cm) were identified. Most patients underwent excision with a periaroeolar incision (n = 31), and an enucleation technique (n = 41), and four patients underwent immediate breast reconstruction. Thirty-three patients had complete medical records with a mean follow-up time of 2.2 ± 4.1 years and no complaints of asymmetry, additional breast deformities, or reconstructive surgery procedures documented. In addition, nine patients completed the investigator-designed survey with a mean follow-up time of 10.1 ± 8.7 years (range 1.5-27.0). Three of these patients reported postoperative breast asymmetry and the desire to pursue reconstructive surgery. Aesthetic outcomes of giant fibroadenoma excision may be satisfactory for many patients without immediate reconstruction, but for others, the need for reconstructive surgery may arise during development. Providers should address this potential need prior to discussing treatment options and during postoperative follow-up. Caution should be exercised before recommending immediate reconstruction.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Fibroadenoma/surgery , Adolescent , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Child , Esthetics , Female , Fibroadenoma/pathology , Follow-Up Studies , Health Surveys , Humans , Mammaplasty/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
6.
J Hand Surg Am ; 40(3): 452-5, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25542431

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy of preoperative electrocardiogram (EKG) screening for Timothy syndrome, a rare and fatal condition characterized by prolonged QT, in children referred for syndactyly release. METHODS: We reviewed the records of nonsyndromic syndactyly patients seen by a hand surgeon at our institution between 2007 and 2013. All underwent a preoperative screening EKG for Timothy syndrome. We reviewed the medical records for demographics, presentation, EKG results, and operative findings, and calculated median age at the time of EKG and surgery and frequency distributions for sex, side affected, EKG result, and clinical finding. The mean patient charge for EKG and interpretation was calculated. RESULTS: We identified 128 syndactyly patients, 72% of which were boys. Median age at the time of EKG testing and syndactyly release was 1 year. A total of 92% of patients had normal EKG results; one patient exhibited a prolonged QT. Ten patients (8%) had further cardiac evaluation because of the EKG result and were found to be normal on repeat testing. No patient met QT threshold for Timothy syndrome and all patients were cleared for surgery. The minimum patient charge for EKG testing was $183. CONCLUSIONS: To improve patient safety, some have advocated preoperative EKG testing for all children undergoing syndactyly release to rule out Timothy syndrome. Analysis of our experience failed to yield an instance of Timothy syndrome over a 7-year period. Although EKG charges were relatively low, costs resulting from additional testing, cardiology consultation, and provider and parent time should be considered. Our study does not support routine EKG testing for children referred for syndactyly release, and we have abandoned this practice. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.


Subject(s)
Autistic Disorder/diagnosis , Electrocardiography/methods , Long QT Syndrome/diagnosis , Syndactyly/surgery , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Long QT Syndrome/complications , Long QT Syndrome/genetics , Male , Patient Safety , Preoperative Care/methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Syndactyly/complications , Syndactyly/diagnosis , Syndactyly/genetics , Treatment Outcome
7.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 134(6): 1116-1123, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25415081

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study measures the impact of adolescent breast asymmetry compared with macromastia and female controls. METHODS: The following surveys were given to patients with breast asymmetry, macromastia, and controls aged 12 to 21 years: Short Form Health Survey, Version 2 (Short Form-36), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the Eating Attitudes Test. Demographics were compared, and linear regression models, adjusted for body mass index category and age, were fit to determine the effect of case status on survey score. RESULTS: Fifty-nine adolescents with asymmetry, 142 controls, and 160 macromastia patients participated. After controlling for differences in body mass index category, asymmetry patients scored lower on psychological Short Form-36 domains and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale than controls (p < 0.05), but did not differ in physical health. When compared with macromastia adolescents, asymmetry patients scored significantly better on Short Form-36 physical health domains (p < 0.05), but had similar decrements in emotional functioning, mental health, self-esteem, and eating behaviors/attitudes, after accounting for differences in age. Age and asymmetry type and severity had no effect on survey scores, independent of body mass index category (p > 0.05). Asymmetry patients had a higher mean body mass index percentile than controls (83.36 versus 73.52) but did not differ from that of macromastia patients (83.39). CONCLUSIONS: Breast asymmetry may negatively impact the psychological quality of life of adolescents similar to macromastia. Breast asymmetry is not just a cosmetic issue. Providers should be aware of the psychological impairments associated with asymmetry and provide proper support.


Subject(s)
Body Image , Breast/abnormalities , Mental Health , Self Concept , Adolescent , Case-Control Studies , Child , Feeding Behavior , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Hypertrophy/psychology , Linear Models , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
8.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 133(5): 654e-661e, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24776567

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pfeiffer syndrome is characterized by craniosynostosis and a variety of associated upper and lower extremity anomalies. The authors reviewed presentation and treatment of upper extremity anomalies in a series of genotyped patients with Pfeiffer syndrome. METHODS: Medical records of patients with Pfeiffer syndrome seen at the authors' institution over a 16-year period were reviewed. Data on clinical presentation, genetic testing, and treatment were collected. The upper extremity anomalies were documented using plain radiographs and physical examinations by a multidisciplinary craniofacial team. RESULTS: Of 15 patients identified as having FGFR1- or FGFR2-confirmed Pfeiffer syndrome, 12 (80 percent) presented with upper extremity anomalies, most commonly broad thumbs [n = 10 (83 percent)], radial clinodactyly (thumbs) [n = 7 (58 percent)], and symphalangism [n = 7 each (58 percent)]. All patients with upper extremity anomalies had lower extremity anomalies. Six of the 12 patients (50 percent) with upper extremity findings underwent surgical correction. FGFR1 or FGFR2 genotype did not correlate with upper extremity phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Although broad thumbs are common, patients with Pfeiffer syndrome often present with other upper extremity anomalies that may not require surgical intervention. Genetic and allelic heterogeneity may explain phenotypic variability in these upper extremity anomalies. Characterization of these limb differences should be made by pediatric hand surgeons as part of a craniofacial team. Treatment decisions should be individualized and dictated by the type and severity of clinical presentation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, IV.


Subject(s)
Acrocephalosyndactylia/genetics , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/genetics , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2/genetics , Thumb/abnormalities , Acrocephalosyndactylia/diagnostic imaging , Acrocephalosyndactylia/surgery , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Genotype , Hand Deformities, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Hand Deformities, Congenital/genetics , Hand Deformities, Congenital/surgery , Humans , Infant , Male , Mutation , Phenotype , RNA Splice Sites , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Synostosis/diagnostic imaging , Synostosis/genetics , Synostosis/surgery , Thumb/diagnostic imaging , Thumb/surgery
9.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 131(4): 890-896, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23542261

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the physical and psychosocial impact of gynecomastia and its severity on adolescents seeking treatment as compared with healthy adolescent males. METHODS: The following surveys were administered to adolescents with gynecomastia and healthy male controls, aged 12 to 21 years: Short Form-36 Version 2, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the Eating Attitudes Test-26. Demographic variables were compared between the two groups, and controls were administered a short chest symptoms survey. Linear regression models, unadjusted and adjusted for body mass index category, were fit to determine the effect of case status and graded severity of gynecomastia on survey score. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with gynecomastia and 92 male control subjects participated in this study. There was no difference in mean age between the groups, although patients with gynecomastia had a significantly higher body mass index. Gynecomastia subjects had three lower Short Form-36 domain and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale scores independent of body mass index category as compared with controls, although there was no difference in Eating Attitudes Test-26 scores between the groups. Graded gynecomastia severity had no effect on survey scores, all independent of body mass index category. CONCLUSIONS: Gynecomastia has a significant negative impact on primarily the psychosocial well-being of affected adolescent patients, specifically in regard to social functioning, mental health, and self-esteem. Psychosocial impact was not affected by graded severity of disease. Health care providers and patients should be aware of the psychosocial impairments associated with gynecomastia and consider early treatment for adolescents suffering from this condition, regardless of severity.


Subject(s)
Gynecomastia/psychology , Adolescent , Case-Control Studies , Child , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...